Re: [office-comment] ODFF: EOMONTH function

[Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com>]

--Y5rl02BVI9TCfPar
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi David,

On Saturday, 2007-12-29 06:46:49 +0000, David King wrote:

> Syntax: EOMONTH( DateParam StartDate ; Number MonthAdd )
> Returns: Number
>=20
> If MonthAdd is to be a Number rather than an Integer, then shouldn't=20
> there be test cases showing MonthAdd=3D1.9 for example? Calc at least doe=
s=20
> not currently comply - it truncates MonthAdd. Actually my view would=20
> indeed be to define MonthAdd as being truncated to an integer.

Done for draft11. That's common application behavior.

> Should this function return a Number, rather than a Date? In fact Calc=20
> returns a Number, requiring manual reformatting by the user.

Return of Number was already done earlier, it seems.


> I hope my various comments on ODFF are seen as helpful - I've no wish to=
=20
> impose. I've had no feedback (but of course it's the holdiday season) -=
=20
> if mine is a useful and appropriate contribution would someone let me=20
> know?

Of course they are useful :-)  I think I already mentioned that earlier
somewhere else.

  Eike

--=20
 OpenOffice.org / StarOffice Calc core developer and i18n transpositionizer.
 SunSign   0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304  7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412
 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

--Y5rl02BVI9TCfPar
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJTn9tZcn5tYf41BIRAuLbAJ0QplWIBRUV1rHdmQe8+XXqKU/0aQCeLRVB
vR+/xP974KN6n2WfkBNV7A4=
=4/Dn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Y5rl02BVI9TCfPar--