OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [office-comment] ODF 1.2 References


> 
> > ISO/IEC 19757-2:2008 is technically equivalent to ISO/IEC 19757-2:2003 
> > + DAM1 + DCOR1.  If a schema is conformant to ISO/IEC 19757-2:2003, 
> > it is gurranteed to be conformant to ISO/IEC 19757-2:2008.
> >
> 
> But will a schema be interpreted the same way?  In other words, will a 
> ISO/IEC 19757-2:2003 express identical constraints when interpreted as a 
> ISO/IEC 19757-2:2008 schema?  Are there any changes we would need to name? 
>  Doc type declaration and namespace is the same?

Yes, a schema is interpreted the same way.  No namespace changes.  No
syntactical differences.  No changes in semantics.

> > As for the Unicode version, this is also an issue of OOXML.  (I
> > submitted a defect report, since 29500 references to V5.0, which 
> > is not the latest.)  We need some text that allows us to reference 
> > to the latest version.
> >
> 
> So Unicode 5.1? (ISO/IEC 10646:2003 plus Amendments 1, 2, 3 and 4)

Well, then do we have to publish a COR when another amendment and a new
version of Unicode appears?  We have to speak with ITTF about this.  

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]