office-comment message

Subject: Re: [office-comment] ODF schema is faulty (ODF all versions)

From: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
To: office-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 20:43:46 +0900

Will you lose something if you replace xsd:ID and xsd:IDREF with xsd:NCName
and drop default values?  You might not be convinced by Alex and me, but I will
certainly continue to argue against what ODF 1.2 is doing and try to make Japan
request changes to the schema  very strongly in the upcoming Japanese ballot.

Makoto

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [office-comment] ODF schema is faulty (ODF all versions)
  - From: Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>

References:
- Annex H ? (ODF 1.2 CD01)
  - From: "Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>
- <text:sequence> behaviour (ODF all versions)
  - From: "Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>
- Re: [office-comment] <text:sequence> behaviour (ODF all versions)
  - From: marbux <marbux@gmail.com>
- <text:input> behaviour (ODF all versions)
  - From: "Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>
- Namespace Names need to change (ODF 1.2)
  - From: "Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>
- draw:name attribute mess (ODF all versions)
  - From: "Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>
- ODF schema is faulty (ODF all versions)
  - From: "Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>
- Re: [office-comment] ODF schema is faulty (ODF all versions)
  - From: Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>