[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: CD01 -- 8.2.1 Referencing Table Cells
I thank Alex for bringing the revised committee draft 02 to my attention. On a closely related matter, it appears that a TC co-chair also believes that it is a conformity requirement in ODF 1.1 that formula addresses start with a "“[“ and end with a “]”. <http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/05/follow-up-on-excel-2007-sp2s-odf.html> (quoting section 8.3.1; however the correction section number for the quoted portion is 8.1.3). The corresponding section in CD 02 is 17.645. Neither ODF 1.1 nor CD 02 establish any requirements at all in regard to formula addresses. The relevant text is merely informative rather than normative. If the TC desires to create conformity requirements in regard to brackets and formula addresses (which would be a Very Good Thing), they must be worded in the imperative using "shall" or "shall not" as required by the authorities I cited earlier in this thread. The closest either document comes to a conformance requirement in the cited sections is the statement that "[e]very formula *should* begin with a namespace prefix specifying the syntax and semantics used within the formula." However, "should" is defined by by ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC Directives Part 2 Annex H as only a recommendation. Conformity may validly be claimed despite a recommendation being ignored. Conforming product characteristics in the international standards context are specified by mandatory requirements, not by recommendations and not by implementer interoperability plug-fests. Cf., the article linked above. Best regards, Paul E. Merrell, J.D. ("Marbux") -- Universal Interoperability Council <http:www.universal-interop-council.org>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]