RE: [office-comment] Relative paths in packages manifest (ODF 1.0/1.1)

["Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>]

Michael hi

> That's not correct. The manifest:full-path attribute does not take an
> IRI. Therefore, the rules regarding the resolution of relative IRIs do
> not apply.

Thanks - but how does one know it's not an IRI? That should surely be
the default assumption.

If it's not an IRI, what is it? If a "filename" per the ZIP appnote,
does that support 18n requiremens?

The spec should certainly be clarified here ...

And thanks for the pointer to the Part 3 draft ...

- Alex.