[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: FW: [office-comment] Signature validity / schema avoidance (ODF 1.2 Part 3 Draft 12)
Bob hi But the schema contradicts that statement. How do you get an ID-typed attribute onto that element with the current schema? Validation is necessary to perform the typing operation. Also, an element may be valid independent of whether its descendant elements are valid – so I don’t agree this is “explicit” – quite the opposite! - Alex. From: Bob Jolliffe [mailto:bobjolliffe@gmail.com] Hi Alex "The Agreed that saying in the schema "anything is allowed within a xmldsig:Signature element" could be misconstrued. Obviously what is meant is that this schema will not attempt to validate it. But the I think the Part 3 is pretty clear on what is expected. Regards, Bob 2009/10/17 Alex Brown <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk> Dear all, |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]