office-comment message

Subject: Re: [office-comment] Signature validity / schema avoidance (ODF 1.2 Part 3 Draft 12)

From: Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com>
To: Alex Brown <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:00:22 +0100

For Object they really do intend not to place restrictions on its possible content. But I am sure this too has implications for the validation of uniqueness of xml:id's for example.

Sorry cancel that comment! I don't think it does. Too late at night to be replying to mail :-)

Bob.

References:
- Clause 6 hanging paragraph (ODF 1.2 Part 3 Draft 12)
  - From: "Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>
- prefixes (ODF 1.2 Part 3 Draft 12)
  - From: "Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>
- permissible encodings of the mimetype file (ODF 1.2 Part 3 Draft 12)
  - From: "Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>
- Preview encrypted documents? (ODF 1.2 Part 3 Draft 12)
  - From: "Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>
- Signature validity (ODF 1.2 Part 3 Draft 12)
  - From: "Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>
- Signature validity / schema avoidance (ODF 1.2 Part 3 Draft 12)
  - From: "Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>
- Re: [office-comment] Signature validity / schema avoidance (ODF 1.2 Part 3 Draft 12)
  - From: Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com>
- Re: [office-comment] Signature validity / schema avoidance (ODF 1.2 Part 3 Draft 12)
  - From: Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com>