[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office-comment] Orientation problems with angles
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 00:35 -0600, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Help me understand this better, > > From the perspective of the observer that you refer to, > > Where is the origin, and in which directions are +X and +Y from that > origin? I don't know, and I don't care. You do not have to have a given coordinate system to define a rotation. A rotation is defined by its centre, the amount and the direction of rotation. > And from which axis (+X, +Y, -X, -Y) extending from the origin does > this clockwise motion originate that opens the angle with respect to > which the gradient vector is oriented? I assume you are referring to opacity gradients here. I agree that draw:opacity is missing a statement what the 0-degree direction is. But this has absolutely nothing to do with how angles are specified. (Note that in the case of opacity, the centre of origin need not be specified since any centre will result in the same gradient.) Note that in the separate thread I already said that draw:opacity is not complete, I also said that "draw:rotation(19.209) is completely specified": "The direction is clockwise, 0 degrees is the vertical axis." Since any choice of centre will result in the same lines (note that for hatches we are a really using a set of parallel lines. [It could be argued that while the direction of these lines is now completely specified, and there distance from each other is also given there are still several hatches that are translated to each other fitting this description. But this has nothing to do with angles and the question at hand.] Andreas -- Andreas J. Guelzow, PhD, FTICA Concordia University College of Alberta
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]