[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office-comment] Error in FLOOR function specification
Dennis Hamilton scripsit: > I don't understand the statement that the result is undefined when x and p > have opposite signs. It is not undefined in the sense of mathematics, where every pair of arguments is defined except those where p = 0. It is undefined in the sense of the OF standard, since different conforming implementations do different things with it. (It *is* defined in the sense of the Common Lisp standard.) > PS: It does not matter whether I believe the statement in the OpenFormula > text is in error or not. I am not on the ODF TC and not the one to make > any repairs to the specification (although sometimes my advice is useful > to the TC). Fair enough. But you claimed that the text was not in fact in error. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org Be yourself. Especially do not feign a working knowledge of RDF where no such knowledge exists. Neither be cynical about RELAX NG; for in the face of all aridity and disenchantment in the world of markup, James Clark is as perennial as the grass. --DeXiderata, Sean McGrath
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]