Re: [office-formula] YEARFRAC again

[Andreas J Guelzow <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca>]

On Fri, 2007-26-01 at 15:40 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> On Thursday, 2007-01-25 13:46:37 -0500, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> 
> > That said, we need to standardize what is standard TODAY, and later on
> > work on standardizing extensions for the future.  How about this:
> > 
> > Note: There are other actual/actual systems, for which currently there
> > are no standard basis assignments.  Future versions of this
> > specification may add them.
> 
> I'm fine with that and will change the portion accordingly.

So if one of the odf supporting applications wants to add another system
we should pick some new basis number, hoping that nobody else picks that
basis for another system or another basis number for the same basis
number?

And all of that because Excel may add another basis number which may
conflict with the ones assigned here even though Excel does not support
odf?

Andreas
-- 
Prof. Dr. Andreas J. Guelzow
Dept. of Mathematical & Computing Sciences
Concordia University College of Alberta