Re: [office-formula] GAMMADIST function's mathematical formula

["David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>]

Eike Rathke:
> Implementation
> GAMMADIST(2;3;5;FALSE()) returns 0.010725
> 
> whereas our definition
> GAMMADIST(2;3;5;FALSE()) would return 0.01134998
> 
> I propose to change our definition to reflect reality of common
> implementation.

Gnumeric 1.6.3 replies with 0.010725 as well.

Unless someone raises a good objection/explanation, I agree, I think we should change it just as Eike has proposed.  Anyone have an objection?

--- David A. Wheeler