[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-formula] Definition of Test case levels
Eike Rathke wrote: > Anyone objecting that I remove them > during my next editing cycle to prevent further confusion? Please _do_ remove the "level" column. We had agreed to do this earlier, but since the tests will not be in the final formal spec anyway, I haven't had much incentive to get around to it. All: Please remember that all the tests will NOT be in the final official spec; all the tests are hidden text. In my opinion, that's a mistake; executable tests are a great boon for understanding a spec, and for doing a "quick check" that an implementation is "getting it right". But I was overruled. It's my hope that the specification + the tests would be released as an "annotated version", and I think a lot of people think that's a reasonable idea, though no one's committed to that. In any case, correcting tests is still valuable as we review the spec. Any inconsistencies between test and the main spec text suggests that one of the two is wrong - and sometimes it's the spec! --- David A. Wheeler
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]