Re: [office-formula] NPV

[Andreas J Guelzow <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca>]

On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 11:15 -0500, Patrick Durusau wrote:
> Greetings!
> 
> Note that NPV lacks parameters in the usual sense of the current draft.

I think you are considering "usual" what you are seeing in the financial
functions section. It is not done that way in any of the other sections
(I think) and is completely pointless to do there (or in the financial
function section either).

Andreas


-- 
Andreas J. Guelzow
Concordia University College of Alberta