Re: [office-formula] Formula Terminology

["Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@pyrshep.ca>]

On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 14:10 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wednesday, 2010-01-13 15:56:09 -0700, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
> 
> > > Do we really mean to say that constraint violations are errors in some 
> > > functions, but not in others?
> > 
> > please see  5.2: "If a constraint is not met, the function/operator
> > should return an Error unless otherwise noted."
> 
> Shouldn't that be "If a constraint is not met, the function/operator
> *shall* return an error unless otherwise noted" instead?
> 

Personally I believe there are too many "should"s in the document and I
agree that this one ought to be a "shall".

Andreas

-- 
Andreas J. Guelzow <aguelzow@pyrshep.ca>