OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
office-formula
84 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Summary 2010-02-23 OpenFormula teleconference
From
"David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com> on 23 Feb 2010 17:13:11 -0000
5.18.77
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on 23 Feb 2010 16:44:54 -0000
page 192 of latest draft.
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on 23 Feb 2010 16:28:40 -0000
Resolved but not applied?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Feb 2010 15:17:17 -0000
Groups - OpenDocument Formula Specification Draft21 2010-02-16 (ODT) (OpenDocument-part2-draft21a-editor-revision.odt) uploaded
From
patrick@durusau.net on 19 Feb 2010 01:58:58 -0000
required annualYield?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 18 Feb 2010 20:23:11 -0000
Groups - OpenDocument Formula Specification Draft21 2010-02-16 (ODT) (OpenDocument-part2-draft21-editor-revision.odt) uploaded
From
erack@sun.com on 16 Feb 2010 21:52:59 -0000
Re: [office-formula] FW: [OpenFormula-discuss] Test Case TablesComing Out for CD01?
From
"David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com> on 16 Feb 2010 17:11:27 -0000
Summary of 2010-02-16 office-formula teleconference
From
"David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com> on 16 Feb 2010 17:04:50 -0000
Groups - OpenDocument Formula Specification Draft20a interim 2010-02-12 (ODT) (OpenDocument-part2-draft20a-editor-revision.odt) uploaded
From
erack@sun.com on 12 Feb 2010 18:33:51 -0000
Re: [office-formula] More conflict - array and its subtypes
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 12 Feb 2010 15:13:52 -0000
RE: [office-formula] More conflict - array and its subtypes - TOUCH-UP
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 11 Feb 2010 23:48:27 -0000
RE: [office-formula] More conflict - array and its subtypes
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 11 Feb 2010 23:29:23 -0000
Re: [office-formula] More conflict - array and its subtypes
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 11 Feb 2010 22:16:18 -0000
RE: [office-formula] More conflict - array and its subtypes
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 11 Feb 2010 20:13:09 -0000
More conflict - array and its subtypes
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 11 Feb 2010 19:55:17 -0000
Reluctantly...
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 10 Feb 2010 21:35:05 -0000
FW: [OpenFormula-discuss] Test Case Tables Coming Out for CD01?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 10 Feb 2010 19:10:42 -0000
RE: [office-formula] ABS != Abs?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 9 Feb 2010 19:57:21 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Non-Scalar Evaluation and References
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 9 Feb 2010 18:01:08 -0000
Summary 2010-02-09
From
"David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com> on 9 Feb 2010 16:59:18 -0000
Re: [office-formula] ABS != Abs?
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 9 Feb 2010 16:10:49 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Non-Scalar Evaluation and References
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 9 Feb 2010 15:45:42 -0000
inline arrays, references, matrices
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 9 Feb 2010 15:41:30 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Non-Scalar Evaluation and References
From
Eric Patterson <ericpa@exchange.microsoft.com> on 9 Feb 2010 15:23:38 -0000
Non-Scalar Evaluation and References
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 9 Feb 2010 15:04:47 -0000
Non-Scalar Evaluation and Intersection
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 9 Feb 2010 14:09:50 -0000
Re: [office-formula] JIRA: please use Fix Version as targetinstead of Affects Version
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 9 Feb 2010 13:58:20 -0000
Groups - OpenDocument Formula Specification Draft20 2010-02-03 (ODT) (OpenDocument-part2-draft20-editor-revision.odt) uploaded
From
patrick@durusau.net on 9 Feb 2010 00:56:42 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
Eric Patterson <ericpa@exchange.microsoft.com> on 9 Feb 2010 00:23:28 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
Andreas Guelzow <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on 8 Feb 2010 22:25:26 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
Eric Patterson <ericpa@exchange.microsoft.com> on 8 Feb 2010 18:53:08 -0000
RE: [office-formula] ABS != Abs?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 8 Feb 2010 18:23:46 -0000
ABS != Abs?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 8 Feb 2010 14:09:01 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on 6 Feb 2010 22:04:41 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 6 Feb 2010 21:06:05 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Portable document issues
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 6 Feb 2010 21:06:04 -0000
Portable document issues
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 6 Feb 2010 20:29:29 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 6 Feb 2010 20:27:45 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on 5 Feb 2010 17:50:00 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 5 Feb 2010 17:11:08 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable documents language
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on 5 Feb 2010 16:21:05 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on 5 Feb 2010 16:08:50 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable documents language
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 5 Feb 2010 14:34:54 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 5 Feb 2010 14:27:31 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable documents language
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on 5 Feb 2010 14:02:23 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable documents language
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 5 Feb 2010 12:07:54 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable documents language
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on 5 Feb 2010 07:16:55 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable documents language
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 5 Feb 2010 01:10:59 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portable documents language
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on 5 Feb 2010 00:50:02 -0000
Portable documents language
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 5 Feb 2010 00:41:17 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on 5 Feb 2010 00:05:15 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on 4 Feb 2010 23:48:59 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on 4 Feb 2010 23:44:39 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
Eric Patterson <ericpa@exchange.microsoft.com> on 4 Feb 2010 23:44:17 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 4 Feb 2010 23:30:13 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
Eric Patterson <ericpa@exchange.microsoft.com> on 4 Feb 2010 22:59:14 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 4 Feb 2010 22:40:55 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
Eric Patterson <ericpa@exchange.microsoft.com> on 4 Feb 2010 22:24:26 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 4 Feb 2010 21:28:03 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca> on 4 Feb 2010 20:48:59 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 4 Feb 2010 20:37:23 -0000
Conflict between Part 1 and Part 2
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 4 Feb 2010 20:08:36 -0000
RE: [office-formula] JIRA: please use Fix Version as target instead of Affects Version
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 4 Feb 2010 19:29:54 -0000
Portability notes
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 4 Feb 2010 12:11:44 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Groups - OpenDocument Formula Specification Draft19 2010-02-03 (ODT) (OpenDocument-part2-draft19-editor-revision.odt) uploaded
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 4 Feb 2010 01:49:08 -0000
Groups - OpenDocument Formula Specification Draft19 2010-02-03 (ODT) (OpenDocument-part2-draft19-editor-revision.odt) uploaded
From
erack@sun.com on 3 Feb 2010 21:49:39 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Portability notes
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 3 Feb 2010 12:38:11 -0000
Portability notes (was: [office-formula] Groups -OpenDocument-part2-draft18-editor-revision(OpenDocument-part2-draft18-editor-revision.odt) uploaded)
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 3 Feb 2010 12:15:29 -0000
Summary of 2010-02-02 Teleconference
From
"David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com> on 2 Feb 2010 17:03:12 -0000
Questioning Portabilty Assertions
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 2 Feb 2010 15:41:58 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Groups - OpenDocument-part2-draft18-editor-revision(OpenDocument-part2-draft18-editor-revision.odt) uploaded
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 2 Feb 2010 14:32:23 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Groups -OpenDocument-part2-draft18-editor-revision(OpenDocument-part2-draft18-editor-revision.odt) uploaded
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 2 Feb 2010 13:52:43 -0000
JIRA: please use Fix Version as target instead of Affects Version
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 2 Feb 2010 13:00:35 -0000
RE: [office-formula] http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2248
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 2 Feb 2010 05:47:56 -0000
Re: [office-formula] http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2248
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 2 Feb 2010 02:27:13 -0000
http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2248
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 1 Feb 2010 22:15:06 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Reminder: Need to assign OpenFormula issuesto either CD01 or CD02
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 1 Feb 2010 22:14:19 -0000
Reminder: Need to assign OpenFormula issues to either CD01 or CD02
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 1 Feb 2010 21:48:52 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Groups - OpenDocument-part2-draft18-editor-revision(OpenDocument-part2-draft18-editor-revision.odt) uploaded
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 1 Feb 2010 18:50:20 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Not worth a JIRA issue - 5.1 Functionnamesignore case. ?
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 1 Feb 2010 17:28:39 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Groups -OpenDocument-part2-draft18-editor-revision(OpenDocument-part2-draft18-editor-revision.odt) uploaded
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 1 Feb 2010 17:02:08 -0000
RE: [office-formula] Not worth a JIRA issue - 5.1 Function namesignore case. ?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 1 Feb 2010 14:33:57 -0000
Re: [office-formula] Not worth a JIRA issue - 5.1 Function namesignore case. ?
From
Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> on 1 Feb 2010 12:17:07 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2