Re: [office-metadata] Groups - Metadata SC meeting modified

[Bruce D'Arcus <bruce.darcus@OpenDocument.us>]

On Jul 26, 2006, at 8:49 AM, patrick@durusau.net wrote:

> I think we need to discuss revision to the current draft of use cases 
> to
> cast it in more traditional user task format.

Just out of curiosity, is this based on some comments?  In any case, do 
you have a list of them that you think are in particular need of this 
that you could post now? Perhaps we can try to tackle some of them 
before the call?

> In order to maintain some forward momentum, however, I also think we 
> need
> to discuss how we are going to develop requirements.

Yes, good idea. One of the reasons I mentioned categorizing the use 
cases is that I thought they might have some different requirements, 
and that we might then be more easily able to divide up that work.

I kind of know what I think the requirements are for my category of use 
case (custom solutions; fields backed up by data), but not others.

Bruce