Re: [office-metadata] RSS 1.0

[robert_weir@us.ibm.com]

Are you thinking of ODF using RSS 1.0
directly?  Or were you looking at RSS as a study in RDF embedding?


I'm not seeing the connection to RSS.

-Rob

"Bruce D'Arcus" <bruce.darcus@OpenDocument.us>
wrote on 08/06/2006 01:55:52 PM:

> Hmmm ... is this list messed up again? Let's hope this goes through
...
> 
> The other day I was looking again at the RSS 1.0 spec, because it
is my 
> belief we can learn a lot from it. Reading it again, that belief is
> strengthened. I suggest we should consider it for the requirements
doc, 
> and later (hopefully soon) the actual proposal.
> 
> See:
> 
> <http://purl.org/rss/1.0/spec>
> <http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/>
> 
> What I (really) like:
> 
> 1) their design goals
> 2) their notion of "modules", as well as the logic behind
it
> 3) their distinction between "simple" and "rich"
extension content
> 
> If I had my druthers, much of this would be in ODF 1.2 in some form,
> with little change.
> 
> Bruce
>