Re: [office-metadata] Metadata only for Content

["Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com>]

On Nov 2, 2006, at 8:56 AM, Svante Schubert wrote:

> 2) But for example "office:body" only contains indirectly Metadata,  
> for instance by having a "text:p" descendant, which might be a  
> child of "office:text".
> "office:body" itself may only contain elements 6 different XML  
> elements, it does not directly contain user data (no text data nor  
> binary data).

But we wouldn't want to have "office:body" as such a metadata- 
enhanceable document object, would we?

I presume you might be thinking about something like a table or image  
wrapper? Would they fit this category?

BTW, for those that might not be familiar with it, the language I  
used to author the schema fragments on the wikis is RELAX NG, but the  
compact non-XML syntax. It's much easier to read and write, and when  
we're ready to put together a final proposal, trivial to convert to  
the XML syntax (using Trang, the wonder tool).

Bruce