[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] Finding a common proposal..
I wrote: > Those metadata properties (in your example the authors' family names, > and the year of publication, plus a year disambiguation suffix that > can only be known by processing the entire in-document list of > citation references; it's not intrinsic to the bibliographic metadata) > are only really relevant to one kind of presentation style. Actually, real-world citation formatting is even more complex than the above. For example, styles typically have (often specific) substitution rules. E.g. what happens if there's no author (substitute title, unless it's an article in a periodical, in which case you substitute the periodical title, etc.)? To go back to the model, a citation field can be modeled liked: _:xyz cite:reference [ dc:source <urn:isbn:34983498> ; cite:pages "23" ] . The source metadata then gets drawn from the book resource description: <urn:isbn:34983498> a b:Book ; dc:title "Some Book" ; dc:date "2006" . This is more-or-less equivalent to in BibTeX \cite[23]{urn:isbn:34983498}. Bruce
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]