[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] Our discussion on the Wiki example
On Jan 2, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Bernd Schuster wrote: >> I think you ask the right questions. If we he wants it to be live >> metadata, then its right there, in the content. > Both scenarios are possible: > 1) content is tagged with meta data and changes during several editing > sessions before it is "finalized" (and therefore must several times be > updated whereever it is stored (content side or meta data side). I > hope this is what you call "live metadata". I just mean user-editable within content. "Finalized" or not -- "stored" somewhere other than the file or not -- is, as you say below, an "engineering question" (not our worry). > 2) content is frozen and tagged afterwards with meta data for example > during archiving. >> But I could also imagine him using a field to display the data pulled >> in from the package instead. > That's right. From my point of view this is rather an engineering > question than a conceptual one. Yes. Bruce
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]