OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office-metadata message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [office-metadata] [issue] keeping subject/object associations


Hi Bruce,

Bruce D'Arcus schrieb:
> I've been chatting a bit with Michael off-list, and I think I'm
> understanding better his (and maybe Svante's) concerns. To quote him:
>
>> Let's take copying the text "Michael Brauer" that has some metadata 
>> assigned as an example. If the user does so because she or he really 
>> wants to duplicate the text, it is probably valid to copy the 
>> matadata. But if the user then replaces "Michael" with "Tom", the 
>> example breaks.
>
> Let me just pull out what I think Michael means by "breaks." I think
> he's worried that the relationship between the sibject and the object
> breaks. The user here means for the property to refer to a subject
> different than the first span.
>
> Is that fair Michael?
>
>> The situation gets more worse if the metadata is maintained by a 
>> component that is not installed, and there the user has no idea what 
>> the metadata means.
>
> Here's what Bernd is (probably rightly) wanting to be the separate
> plug-in issue.
>
>> That's actually another reason why I think linking metadata to the 
>> content by ids (and the classes you have suggested) may have 
>> advantages. For ids, it is clear that they must not be copied. An 
>> application may however create a new id, and may call the metadata 
>> component if installed to inform it that the new id exists. The meta 
>> data component than may take the action that is appropriate. The 
>> office application does not need to know about it. All it knows and 
>> has to care about are the ids. For classes, we may define a similar 
>> behavior.
>
> So maybe we ought to narrow down the problem here to an implementation
> question of how to preserve the relationships between subjeccts and
> objects, in a context where users may be copy-and-pasting -- and
> otherwise modifying -- metadata-enhanced content? Can we agree on
> that?
I agree,
what you say is the top most view on all issues concerning the integrity 
of content and assoicated metadata.
Splitting, changing, copy and pasting content and the absence of plugins 
are all subitems from this standpoint.

Bernd
>
> Bruce


-- 
mit freundlichem Gruß

Bernd Schuster

MSK Gesellschaft für Automatisierung mbH
Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 33
D-22869 Schenefeld

Tel.: +49 40 839286-10
Fax : +49 40 839286-29

eMail: schuster@mskgmbh.com




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]