Two questions regarding the latest draft..

[Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM>]

Hi group,

During editing the draft the following two possible minor issues arose:

   1. The root element of the metadata manifest <mm:Manifest> has two
      attributes rdf:about and odf:baseID. Their value seem quite
      similar to me, is odf:base still necessary?
   2. In the OWL description we use odf:path twice. Once for the path of
      mm:Entry and once for the path of odf:Element.
      How is such a case usually handled in a OWL description? Are there
      two definitions for odf:path or one with a somehow extended domain?

Svante

Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM wrote:
> Please notice that some of the very late change of this draft has not yet
> been reviewed by Patrick. 
>
> We can be certain that some of the structure/layout are still about to
> change, for example the OWL description is currently quite difficult to
> read.