[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Fwd: language
Argh ... cc-ed the wrong list ... Begin forwarded message: > > > Hmm, this is a little tricky; going to cc this to the list in case > anyone else has thoughts ... > > On Jun 27, 2007, at 8:37 AM, Svante Schubert wrote: > >> Which version do prefer, the third is currently in the spec: >> >> "The odf:Package resource description in the metadata manifest >> represents the OpenDocument package itself." >> or >> "The odf:Package node in the metadata manifest represents the >> OpenDocument package itself." >> or >> "The odf:Package in the metadata manifest represents the OpenDocument >> package itself." > > The problem is that you are assuming a particular syntax; > > <odf:Package> > ... > </odf:Package> > > ... rather than: > > <rdf:Description> > <rdf:type rdf:resource="[uri]"/> > </rdf:Description> > > To "odf:Package node" in the second case wouldn't make sense. To be > more precise, maybe something like: > > "The odf:Package class refers to the OpenDocument package itself." > > Bruce >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]