Re: [office-metadata] citation

[Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>]

Svante Schubert wrote:

> Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>> OK, I need some help on the citation field. Svante? Can you help me 
>> get this out? I'm totally overwhelmed with work and don't really know 
>> what this should look like
> I am currently equally overwhelmed with work, I have not even finished 
> the editorial part on the metadata, yet.
> There have to be someone else to prepare the proposal.
> Even if I had the time I am not an expert in citation as you are, I do 
> not know the requirements, would not be able to create a citation 
> grammar, I could only assist you by reviewing it.

OK.

Then I suggest we look to include the generic classes and properties I 
posted in the main metadata proposal.

To repeat, we need a generic Field class that people can subclass. So 
something like:

field:Field a owl:Class ;
     rdfs:label "Field"@en ;
     rdfs:comment "A generic document field."@en .

field:Reference a owl:Class ;
     rdfs:label "Reference"@en ;
     rdfs:comment "A reference to an object."@en ;
     rdfs:subClassOf odf:Field .

We then need the following properties:

field:prefix a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
     rdfs:domain odf:Field ;
     rdfs:range rdfs:Literal ;
     rdfs:label "prefix"@en;
     rdfs:comment "A field prefix."@en .

field:prefix a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
     rdfs:domain odf:Field ;
     rdfs:range rdfs:Literal ;
     rdfs:label "prefix"@en;
     rdfs:comment "A field prefix."@en .

field:sequence a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
     rdfs:domain field:Field ;
     rdfs:range xsd:integer ;
     rdfs:label "sequence"@en;
     rdfs:comment "An index position within an ordered sequence."@en .

With those general structures in place, it's easy for me to build the 
citation stuff on top of that.

Bruce