[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Sigh, one more typo?
Patrick, Patrick Durusau wrote: > Michael, > > Was reading through the index section this weekend thinking about > something to propose for phase two when I ran across the following: > > page 141, just after line 2706, the section header reads: > > index scope (which is correct but the first line reads) > > The text:index-source attribute determines.... > > Should read: > > The text:index-scope attribute determines.... > > Sorry I did catch this earlier. > > Suggestion: > > There is a 30 day public review before a Committee Draft can be > submitted to OASIS for consideration as an OASIS standard, for the > express purpose of making sure the draft "is as "clean" and complete as > possible before its acceptance as an OASIS Standard" (quote from the > website). > > Might I suggest that the ballot proceed on the document "as is" and use > the upcoming 30 day review as a time to scout for other typos, etc.? > > Does require another vote if we change the document but the current vote > gives public notice of the substantial progress of the TC over the past > year. This sounds reasoable. We should discuss this in our con call today. > > Hope everyone is having a great day! > > Patrick > Michael
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]