[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] SPEC: wrong mimetype in example
Hi all, David Faure wrote: >>Another thing: for directories the example says manifest:media-type="". >>The explanation for media-type in 16.6.3 doesn't say explicitely that directories >>must be listed in the manifest, and they should have an empty media-type. >>Can this be added? >> >> > >I think this was never discussed. What should be the media-type for directories? > > Hmm, I'm surprised they have a media-type at all... Some inquiring presents: In OOo, if a directory has semantics of its own (such as a directory containing a sub-document), then it received a suitable media type (e.g. that for the sub-document-type). Other directories which are just there for administrative or convenience reason (such as Pictures/) have no media type, which is written as an empty attribute. I'm not sure if it would make sense to introduce a general-purpose directory media-type. Sincerely, Daniel
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]