[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: 2.1 Document Roots
Greetings! I have been over this section several times over a couple of days trying to decide why it seems confusing. Before suggesting any changes, let me test my understanding of what it is saying. <office:document> The root element if, and only if, the document is being represented in a single XML document. If the document is being represented in a package (section 17), there is no <office:document> root element and in that case, <office:document-content>, etc., are all contained in <manifest:manifest xmlns:manifest="urn:oasis:names:tc:openoffice:xmlns:manifest:1.0"> within: <manifest:file-entry> elements. Curious if it the case that when using an Open Office document represented within a package if it is treated as though it has a <office:document> element with the other subdocuments occurring within. I suspect that is the intent but statements like in the first row of the table on root elements, which says <office:document> is 'Complete office document in a single XML document.' immediately following the section on representation, seem to point to the interpretation I give above. My thinking is that however the Open Office document is represented, it should have (or be considered to have when represented as a package) <office:document> as its root element. Close, far away, lost? Hope everyone is having a great day! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau Director of Research and Development Society of Biblical Literature Patrick.Durusau@sbl-site.org Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]