Re: [office] 3nd paragraph, 4.1.3 Common Paragraph Elements Attributes

[Michael Brauer <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>]

Patrick,

Patrick Durusau wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> The second and third sentences of the third paragraph of 4.1.3 read:
> 
> If both, text:style-name and text:class-names are present, the style 
> referenced by the text:style-name attribute is treated like being the 
> first style in the list. If a conditional style is specified together 
> with style:class-names attribute, but without the text:style-name 
> attribute, then first style in style list should meet the requirements 
> that would apply to the text:style-name attribute if it exists.
> 
> Question: Does the second sentence mean that the style referenced by the 
> text:style-name attribute becomes part of the list contained in 
> text:class-names? Or is it meant to say that if both exist, use the 
> text:style-name?
> 
> If the former, suggest:
> 
> If both text:style-name and text:class-names attributes are present, the 
> style referenced by the text:style-name attribute is treated as the 
> first style in the list in text:class-names.

The former is meant, so I've changed the sentences and the other
ouccurences of "like being" as suggested by you.
> 
> BTW, just in case I don't get that far, 'like being' also occurs in 
> 5.1.3 Attributed Text, 3rd paragraph, and 9.2.15 Common Drawing Shape 
> Attributes, under the heading Style, 3rd paragraph.
> 
> Comment:
> 
> The third sentence seems confusing.
> 
> Suggest:
> 
> If a conditional style is specified together with style:class-names 
> attribute, but without the text:style-name attribute, then first style 
> in style list is used as the value of the missing text:style-name attribute.

I've changed that as well.
> 
> Hope everyone is having a great day!
> 
> Patrick


Michael