[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Metadata uses cases, classification
Greetings! There have been several suggested "classifications" of use cases posted. While I think it would be pendantic to try to separate discussion of use cases from their classification, I think it would be more profitable to focus on collecting use cases and not make a systematic attempt to create categories for them, at least at this point. No one should feel inhibited by that suggestion and if anyone has a category (or more than one or even a system) that they want to suggest, please feel free. What I would caution against is early discussion about which categories are going to be useful or even necessary in the final analysis. While I am not unsympathetic to the ones suggested thus far, I can' t say that any of them strike me as being all encompassing or resistance to modification. I am hopeful that even as we wait for the formal mailing lists, etc., that we can all generate, look for, invite others to submit use cases. I think we will find a number of commonalities between use cases from different communities and that will be a good thing. It will be some indication of what requirements, when derived from the use cases, will be of a wider interest than others. I hope everyone is at the start of a great week! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau Patrick@Durusau.net Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 2003-2005 Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]