RE: [office] OASIS process

["Bastian, Waldo" <waldo.bastian@intel.com>]

ODF 1.0 has passed step #6 already. I understand your question to mean where the process for ODF 1.1 should start. I expect that to be step #1. 

Waldo Bastian
Linux Client Architect - Channel Platform Solutions Group
Intel Corporation - http://www.intel.com/go/linux
OSDL DTL Tech Board Chairman
________________________________________
From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 6:18 AM
To: OpenDocument Mailing List
Subject: Re: [office] OASIS process

Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> wrote on 03/17/2006 06:59:20 AM:
> 
> 1. The OpenDocument TC approves a specification as committee draft.
> 2. A public review of the committee draft takes place for a minimum 
> of 60 days.
> 3. If comments are received that require a change of the specification, the 
> spcification is changed accordingly, and a public review of the changes takes 
> place for 15 days. This step may be repeated.
> 4. The TC approves the specification as committee specification.
> 5. The TC submits the Committee Specification to the membership of OASIS for 
> consideration as an OASIS Standard. This submission must be requested by the 
> 15th of a month.
> 6. Starting at the 1st of the next month, the voting takes place. 

So, the question is this:  If we make changes to ODF 1.0 in response to comments, does this send us back to step #1?  Or does that send us back to step #3?   

-Rob