office message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: 3/16 Minutes
- From: Nathaniel S Borenstein <nborenst@us.ibm.com>
- To: office@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:43:22 -0500
OASIS ODF Accessibility SC Meeting MINUTES
Thursday March 16, 2006
[Please send any corrections or additions
to Nathaniel this week.]
Attending (This is probably wrong):
Nathaniel Borenstein, Jerry Barrier, Mike Paciello, Chieko Asakawa,
Hironobu Takagi, Tatsuye Ishihara, Steve Noble, Peter Korn, Rich Schwerdtfeger,
Janina Sajka. Janina took notes in the absence of Dave Pawson, from
which these minutes were prepared by the chair.
I. The minutes of the March 9
meeting were approved as corrected and submitted.
II. Next week, most of this subcommittee
will be at CSUN, while others (Nathaniel, anyway) will be at IETF. We
discussed having a semi-formal meeting of the subcommittee at CSUN, and
(with refinement on the mailing list) agreed on a date, time, and place.
Topics to be discussed in person were added throughout the meeting:
(1) Focus tracking (2) Z-order (3) alt-texts.
III. The topic of short vs long
alt-text fields was discussed. The mediaobject proposal might be
a better way to approach this problem, but it was agreed that this was
too big a change to undertake for our short term (June) deadline, but agreed
we should consider it seriously after that. It was generally agreed
to take the short/long approach in the near term. In the long term
we will discuss both the mediaobject proposal and the possible use of the
caption field.
IV. The table/svg issue was discussed.
There is a consensus between the TC and the SC that this is a job
for the TC, but that the SC has a role in formally raising it to the attention
of the TC. It is hoped but not yet certain that the TC can solve
this problem in the short-term time frame.
V. List item issue: There
is no easy semantic way to know how deep we are in a nested list structure.
The appropriate information might be inferred, but only in a rather
klugy way that puts a larger burden on implementers. The obvious
way to fix this would be to add an indent or depth attribute.
VI. List of use cases from Matt:
After discussion, the SC concluded that there were not additional
requirements generated from these use cases. Sighs of relief were
audible all around.
VII. Traversal of objects in a
complex drawing was discussed, somewhat inconclusively, and deferred to
the in-person meeting at CSUN.
The next meeting will take place on
March 30.
Summary of action items:
Dave Pawson -- Although absent from
this meeting, Dave as document editor needs to make sure that topics III
and V make it into the document.
Various -- Try to make progress at CSUN
on the key issues described above.
Nathaniel -- Follow up with TC on Table/SVG
issue (again)
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]