[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-accessibility] Requested editorial change to Appendix E inthe ODF 1.1 specification
Mary, Mary McRae wrote: > Ah, I shouldn't read my email in reverse order ;-) > > Ok, I will go ahead and get the announcement out this afternoon. Yes, it's > perfectly reasonable for this change request to be submitted as part of the > public review process and later incorporated in the spec without requiring a > further public review. Thank you very much for starting the public review. Michael > > Regards, > > Mary > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Peter.Korn@Sun.COM [mailto:Peter.Korn@Sun.COM] >>Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 12:15 PM >>To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org >>Cc: 'Richard Schwerdtfeger'; Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM; >>office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org; >>office@lists.oasis-open.org; 'Robert Weir'; mayue@cn.ibm.com >>Subject: Re: [office-accessibility] Requested editorial >>change to Appendix E in the ODF 1.1 specification >> >>Hi Mary, >> >>The change we would like to make is a small clarification >>change in the non-normative portion of the document - Appendix E. >> >>Separately from Michael (who I believe has left work for the day in >>Germany) I understand that if the document doesn't go out >>today, we miss our timeline. >> >>I believe this change can be made within the 60 day public >>review (as an editorial change, especially as it is non-normative). >> >>So, I suggest you do NOT delay, but go ahead with PR this afternoon. >> >>Rich - is this acceptable to you? >> >> >>Peter >> >>>I was about to announce the PR this afternoon ... Michael, >> >>let me know >> >>>if I should hold up or if you'd instead like this handled >> >>as a comment >> >>>submitted during the public review to be incorporated prior >> >>to CS vote. >> >>> >>>Mary >>> >>> >> >>-------------------------------------------------------------- >>---------- >> >>> *From:* Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com] >>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 27, 2006 11:27 AM >>> *To:* Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM >>> *Cc:* office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org; >>> office@lists.oasis-open.org; Robert Weir; Peter.Korn@Sun.COM; >>> mayue@cn.ibm.com >>> *Subject:* [office-accessibility] Requested editorial change to >>> Appendix E in the ODF 1.1 specification >>> >>> Michael, >>> >>> The ODF Accessibility Subcommittee would like to make >> >>an editorial >> >>> change to the non-normative Appendix E.3 of the ODF 1.1 >>> specification. >>> >>> Change: >>> >>> Users importing non-OpenDocument slides that contain tables need >>> access to the table structure via their assistive technology. >>> Therefore tables imported into OpenDocument from another file >>> format must have their structure preserved, and should >> >>be imported >> >>> as embedded spreadsheets. >>> >>> to: >>> >>> Users importing non-OpenDocument slides that contain tables need >>> access to the table structure via their assistive technology. >>> Therefore tables imported into an OpenDocument application from >>> another file format must have their structure >> >>preserved, and when >> >>> saved as ODF should be saved as embedded spreadsheets. >>> >>> The way this was previously worded was ambiguous in that Open >>> Document applications may import powerpoint slides natively and >>> saying that you would need to convert the document to >> >>an embedded >> >>> spreadsheet for a powerpoint slide would be >> >>incorrect.and we would >> >>> like to see this changed. >>> >>> We would like to have this appear in the ODF 1.1 specification >>> going out for public review next week however we do not >> >>want this >> >>> to hold up the 60 day review. If this cannot be done in time for >>> the review then we will add this as part of the review comments. >>> >>> Rich >>> >>> >>> Rich Schwerdtfeger >>> Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist >>> Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board >>> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer >>> >> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]