[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] ODF with W3C CDF
Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > > On Oct 17, 2006, at 7:02 AM, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - > Hamburg wrote: > >> The reason we are using our own namespaces for SVG, SMIL and XSL-FO >> are not validation problems, but that these specifications do not >> contain schema modules that we may include. In particular, they do not >> define global attributes, but all attributes do only exist for >> specific elements. > > Question: is it the case that they simply by oversight "do not define" > these global attributes (as I would guess), or is there a sound > technical reason for it (which I'd guess not)? I think there are no technical reasons, but defining these attributes is some work. > > If the former, then it might be worth revisiting again going forward? We may actually get in contact with the various groups, but since these attributes have to be in a W3C recommendation before we can use them, this is probably not a topic for ODF 1.2. We also have to take into account that changing namespaces would be an incompatible change. > > Bruce > Michael
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]