[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] ISO/IEC 26300
James, TC members, James: Thank you very much for this update. TC members: I will put the question how we proceed with ODF1.1 regarding ISO on the agenda of our call on Monday. Best regards Michael James Bryce Clark wrote: > As you may know, ISO has changed the visible status of OpenDocument v1 > as approved (ISO/IEC 26300) to correctly reflect its International > Status standard, "60.00" in its harmonized stage coding. This can be > seen by searching for "26300" in the ISO search function, after > selecting "Search options > ISO number" and "Items to show > Both", at > http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueListPage.CatalogueList?&scopelist=ALL. > > Another way into this data is the following compound search results URI: > http://www.iso.org/iso/en/catsupport/StandardsQueryFormHandler.StandardsQueryFormHandler?scope=ALL&keyword=&isoNumber=26300&sortOrder=ISO&title=true&search_type=ISO&search_term=26300 > > > A table of the stage codes appears here: > http://www.iso.org/iso/en/widepages/stagetable.html > > When the IS is released for official publication in a few weeks, that > status code will be upgraded to "60.60" to reflect the availability of > copies for sale at the ISO web store. > > Likely our next topic, regarding ISO/IEC JTC1, will be what to advise > them regarding v1.1 (which you've completed and are balloting now, > congratulations) and v1.x/2.0. We've indicated that we plan to bring > back appropriately stable revisions to JTC1. So the question will be > which next version is "appropriately stable." Based on preliminary > chats with several of you, it's my understanding is that v1.1 is > unlikely to be suggested for resubmission. > > Kind regards JBC > > ~ James Bryce Clark > ~ Director of Standards Development, OASIS > ~ jamie.clark@oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]