[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Re: [office-comment] Re: my comments on the numbering spec proposal discussed by David F. andFlorian R.
On Dec 11, 2006, at 12:04 PM, David Faure wrote: > However the notion of a list-id for a bit more structure sounds > nice, and from what I recall, > MSWord lists also have the equivalent of a list-id, this is where > this idea mostly comes from. My question about the generic identity issue goes back to the xml:id discussion. Do we want to converge the myriad of different equivalent attributes (but which XML tools of course do not understand as such) towards xml:id? If yes, should we be introducing still new id attributes? Just asking ... Bruce
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]