Re: [office] Re: [office-comment] Re: my comments on the numbering spec proposal discussed by David F. andFlorian R.

["Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com>]

On Dec 11, 2006, at 12:45 PM, David Faure wrote:

> Well that's very different ;) xml-id is supposed to be unique, right?
> list-id, on the other hand, is about referring to a list from  
> multiple numbered paragraphs,
> so it's definitely NOT unique (the same value would be found  
> multiple times in a given
> xml document).

Oops, sorry; yes, you're right. :-)

It does relate to our metadata discussions, though.

For example, we're discussing proposing a few new attributes (drawn  
from RDFa) that would allow stuff something like (e.g. don't hold me  
to the details just yet):

<text:list meta:about="list-1">
   ...
</text:list>

That identifies that object with a local URI of "list-1".

Perhaps there's value in having the specific list-id attribute  
though; am not sure. Just wanted to mention that we're discussing  
some related issues.

Bruce