[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: OpenDocuemnt TC Work Call Minutes 2007-01-08
RollCall: Robert Weir, IBM Helen Yue, IBM Patric Durusau David Faure, KDE Florian Reueter, Novell Michael Brauer, Sun Microsystems Lars Oppermann, Sun Microsystems Gary Edwards, OpenDocument Foundation David A Wheeler, OpenDocument Foundation Minutes from last work-call (Dec. 14th) The attending TC members unanimously accepted the minutes from the last work call. Action Items Michael, proposal regarding pp./ff.ongoing Reports Ballot for ODF 1.1 is in progress, primary represenatives are now have to familiarize themselfes with the specification, vote will start Jan. 15th and will be open until Jan 31th. Michael: did lots of rework on ODF 1.2 draft and Patrick sent along many improvements and suggestions. Rework is mostly done, including ISO adoptions. Also minor editorial changes to some descriptions were clarity could be improved. I am currently going through the questions from Gary and when I am done with that I will send the first ODF 1.2 draft to the TC. I have not yet split up the specification into parts and that is the next step I am going to take. I built some scripts that check for consistency between attribute names mentioned in the text and their schema counterparts. Agenda Topics: Missing namespace prefixes (in 1.1 spec) Michael: These will be resolved in the draft that I will send out. We will need to submit an official errata document. (for ODF 1.1) We create a committee draft for that and submit it for public review This can only be done once in 6 month. Rob This issue also applies to 1.0 2nd ed According to OASIS rules, erratas can only be issued for OASIS Standards We should maintain errata documents. Michael: since we are not currently in a review phase, so we are not under obligation to respond in any particular way. We should however acknowledge the issue. Lars: So we could create an errata document right away Michael: might cause confusion DavidW: we could create a draft errata doc in the wiki Rob:... and than issue an errata doc once every six month (or whatever is deemed appropriate by the TC) ACTION: Michael to create Errata page (1.1 and 1.0) 1.2 Proposals Michael: updated 1.2 action item list and split it into categories: suggested, agreed to do, proposals under discussion and approved proposals. DavidW: is anyone going through OOXML to check whether there is anything in there that is hard to represent in ODF? Michael: I think the implementors are aiming at interoperability with MS office and what needs representation in ODF. Lars: out method of requirements eliction here shoulöd be to let imple,mentors drive this, by suggesting what additional representations are needed in ODF in order to reach interoperatbility Michael: I can give an indirect update regarding to List/Numbering. From the discussion on the list and discussion with developers. The proposal was to follow DavidF's ID-approach for numbered paragraphs and Florian's override approach for Lists. DavidF: that's great and is in line with what Thomas has proposed. New Action Items. Michael to create Errata page (1.1 and 1.0)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]