Re: [office] Re: [office-comment] Re: my comments on the numberingspec proposal discussed by David F. andFlorian R.

[Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems<Oliver-Rainer.Wittmann@Sun.COM>]

Florian Reuter wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> just wanted to get the list understanding phase restarted. 
> 
> Is there a common sense what the following list definition will lead to?
> 
> LS1=< {"1"/1}, {"1"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … >
> LS2=< {"1"/1}, {"A"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … >
> LS3=< {"A"/1}, {"i"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … >
> LS4=< {"i"/1}, {"a"/2}, {"1"/3}, {"1"/4}, … >
> 
> <list style-name="LS1">
> <list-item>
>   <p>..<p>
>   <list style-name="LS3">
>    <list-item> <p>..<p> </list-item>
>    <list-item> <p>..<p> </list-item>
>  </list>
> </list-item>
> </list>
> 
> Will it be
> 1.
> 1.i.
> 1.ii.
> 
> -- or --
> 1.
> A.i.
> A.ii.
> 
> or something completely different?
> 


Hi,

For me it's:

1.
A.i.
A.ii.

as David, Michael and I already answered at 2007-01-22.

Regards, Oliver.