Re: [office] list-override proposal

["Florian Reuter" <freuter@novell.com>]

Hi Thomas,

this is just my proposal. I guess Oliver asked you to write a proposal of your idea.

----

I know that sometimes "silence means agreement". However it just took me some time to get a better understanding of the
numbering issue.

So I'm sorry to say that I don't agree to the "consensus" Oliver proposed for reasons of
* Backward compatibility
* Problem mapping between text:lists and numbered-paragraphs
* Redundant information.

As I said in the last TC meeting my rejection of the list-id approach is based on what I understand of the list-id
approach. Maybe I understood it wrong. So a grammar and an explanation would help. Furthermore mapping the examples I
made to the list-id approach might also help me understand the issue better.

I still don't see why a list-override would not be sufficient for you?

~Florian

P.S.
Do you agree with the examples I made to illustrate how text:list and text:numbered-paragraph currently play together in
ODF1.1?

>>> Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> 03/06/07 5:02 PM >>>
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 16:11, Florian Reuter wrote:
> Here is my proposal for the list-override enhancement.

Have I missed something?

As I understood from David end last year, the consensus was that the 
style-override would _only_ be for text:list way of working and the list-id 
would _only_ be for the numbered-paragraph way of working.

The attached proposal doesn't reflect this at all.

See;
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200612/msg00001.html
-- 
Thomas Zander