Re: [office] list-override proposal

["Florian Reuter" <freuter@novell.com>]

Hi David,

I did include the "continue-numbering" on every par 'cause I couldn't find a consensus with Oliver what the default
value is.
Thomas had this concern of always repeating "continue-numbering" too.

I updated my samples and set the default of continue-numbering to "true" (to which Oliver disagrees :-))

Attached is the updated sample doc.

~Florian


>>> David Faure <faure@kde.org> 03/12/07 4:37 PM >>>
On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Florian Reuter wrote:
> I also included some "normative examples" for ODF1.1 lists to avoild from misunderstandings of how lists currently
work.
> 
> ~Florian
> numlistpar.odt

Why do those examples specify text:continue-numbering for every numbered-paragraph?
It seems to me that samples 1 and 2 don't need it at all.

And in sample 1 isn't it a typo that its value is false/false/true?
I don't understand why such a simple example needs continue-numbering to be set at all,
and even less why it would have a different value for those paragraphs.

-- 
David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).

normativeodf11samples.odt