[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] list-override proposal
On Monday 12 March 2007 17:18, Florian Reuter wrote: > I did include the "continue-numbering" on every par 'cause I couldn't find > a consensus with Oliver what the default value is. > Thomas had this concern of always repeating "continue-numbering" too. > > I updated my samples and set the default of continue-numbering to "true" > (to which Oliver disagrees :-)) My interpretation of the standard was that it was not either true nor false, it was dependent on a lot of other items. Lets forget these examples and look at the future. In the list-id example the continue-numbering can be defined much more strictly as we don't need it anymore for specifying the domain of a list. List-id does that. -- Thomas Zander
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]