Re: [office] style:list-style-name and list-id

["Florian Reuter" <freuter@novell.com>]

Oh. I tought I did.

But I'm happy to be more precice:

* Michael stated the intend of ODF1.0 was to indeed have list-domains be
separate from markup as we follow known standards, not always blindly follow
the things that (previous) office suites do.

<disagree>
Michael looking in his crystal ball what ODF1.0 mean doesn't help.
I disagree that Michael really said "...not always blindly follow the things that (previous) office suites do". Since it
is the charter of ODF to listen very carefully what office suite do :-)
Summarize: We agreed to focus on 1.2. and not to try to find out what ODF1.0 does any longer.
</disagree>

* ODF is used in places outside the office suite. In places like HTML, TeX and
other languages that aim to separate content from markup the concept of lists
being discoupled from the markup they use has been folllowed.

<agreed>
ODF is used in places outside the office suite.
</agreed>
<disagree>
Brinding Latex into play doesn't help, since neither my nor your porposal supports what Latex does. They have "counter
variables". Not "counter domains".
<disagree>
<comment>
Both our proposals can encode HTML lists.
</comment>

* KWord has had the concept of list-domain being separate from style for a
long time.
* OpenOffice does the opposite to KWord in that respect.
<comment>
MS Word does this opposite to KWord too.
</comment>

Does this help?

~Florian


>>> Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> 03/13/07 10:36 AM >>>
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 10:17, Florian Reuter wrote:
>  Please reflect upon the above and reply
> giving us your opinion on this.  Each point with an "Agree" / "I think
> different, because" would be much appreciated.

Could you do this, please?
-- 
Thomas Zander