[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] list-override proposal
Hey. That's a statement I can understand. So why isn't that statement in your proposal then :-) So you say: * text:continue-numbering will be removed from text:numbered-paragraph, entirely. Is this correct? ~Florian >>> David Faure <faure@kde.org> 03/13/07 11:03 AM >>> On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Florian Reuter wrote: > If I understood correctly then the start-value is only considered when continue-numbering is "false"? Sigh.. Didn't I just say that in my opinion continue-numbering makes no sense for numbered-paragraph and should be removed from the specification for numbered-paragraph? We don't use it in KOffice, it makes no sense. start-value, however, makes a lot of sense, as per the example in my previous mail ;) -- David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE, Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]