[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Critical problem
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 12:49, Florian Reuter wrote: > Hey. This is really no trick question. I don't know the answer. I only know > an answer according to my proposal. In the context of <text:list>s, how is your proposal different from ours? See this stuff I wrote a week ago, in a reply to you. On Tuesday 06 March 2007 18:08, Thomas Zander wrote: > > I still don't see why a list-override would not be sufficient for you? > > That's a misunderstanding; I have absolutely nothing against list-override. > As long as its used in the proper context. > > Basis difference between numbered paragraphs and text:list hierarchies are > context. > 1) numbered-paragraph does NOT have a way to map it to the list it belongs > to. Text-list does have that because it is nested. So just get the xml-node > that's the parent and you have the list it belongs to. > We talked before about using the list-style as a marker for which list it > belongs to; please read the archives for mails on why that's a bad idea. > (hint its about separation of content and markup) > > 2) text:list does NOT have a way to give each item (aka paragraph) a > different style. Instead you give the style to the list. > > The proposal I made in December [1] was to make the two basic units for > lists more common by adding a feature to each. > 1) Add list-id to numbered paragraphs to make it more like text:list. > 2) add text:style-override to text:list to make it more like the numbered > paragraphs. -- Thomas Zander
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]