Re: [office] Critical problem

[Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems<Oliver-Rainer.Wittmann@Sun.COM>]

Hi Florian,

Sorry, that I didn't answer to your request in the next second after you 
have put it to the mailing list.
Currently, I'm busy this some other stuff.
Be patient, I will provide you the XML fragment.


Regards, Oliver.

Florian Reuter wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> could you please send me the XML fragment. That's all I need. So again. How will
> <text:numbered-paragraph text:list-id="id1" style:name="L1"><text:p>H1</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph>
> <text:p>Text</text:p>
> <text:numbered-paragraph text:list-id="id1" style:name="L1"><text:p>H2</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph>
> <text:p>Text</text:p>
> <text:numbered-paragraph text:list-id="id2" style:name="L1"><text:p>NP1</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph>
> <text:numbered-paragraph text:list-id="id2" style:name="L1"><text:p>NP2</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph>
> <text:numbered-paragraph text:list-id="id2" style:name="L1"><text:p>NP3</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph>
> <text:numbered-paragraph text:list-id="id2" style:name="L1"><text:p>NP4</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph>
> <text:p>Text</text:p>
> <text:numbered-paragraph text:list-id="id1" style:name="L2"><text:p>Appendix</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph>
> <text:p>Text</text:p>
> 
> be represented in text:list. According to your personal understandin of the proposal?
> 
> Thats all I need.
> 
> Sometimes a "picture" speaks more than thousand words to me.
> 
> ~Florian
> 
> 
>>>> Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> 03/13/07 1:29 PM >>>
> On Tuesday 13 March 2007 13:15, Florian Reuter wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> I really need to see an XML fragment using text:list which encodes what the
>> numbered-paragraph (list-id) fragment. Or a statement that it isn't
>> possible.
> 
> Of course its possible.
> Have you actually read the proposal?
> Which part of "Which makes it possible" in the email you replied to, is not 
> clear?
> 
> Stop making assumptions about things you think are being said, but are not 
> actually said and read a LOT more carefully the emails we write before making 
> assumptions and putting words in peoples mouths on a public list, pretty 
> please.
> 
> ps. no I'm not angry; I just want to be clear without pretty words obscuring 
> the point.