Re: [office] Critical problem

[Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org>]

I would say that with 1.2 + proposal the result would be according to the 
first of your lists below.

On Tuesday 13 March 2007 14:56, Florian Reuter wrote:
> Too much lists for today.
>
> I meant :-(
>
> Thanks so much Oliver.
>
> Do I understand it right that according to the ODF1.2. idea you have in
> mind acutally the fragment below will be interpreted as
> 1. P1
> 2. P2
> Text
> I. P3
> II. P4
> Text
> 3. P5
> 4. P6
>
> (thus establishing a 1:1:relationship between style and counter) or will it
> still be according to ODF1.2
>
> 1. P1
> 2. P2
> Text
> III. P3
> IV. P4
> Text
> 1. P5
> 2. P6
>
> ?
>
> Sorry.

-- 
Thomas Zander

PGP signature