Re: [office] Status of list discussions/Suggestion howto proceed

["Florian Reuter" <freuter@novell.com>]

Hi Oliver,

so the latest proposal at http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200703/msg00262.html is an updated version of
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200703/msg00177.html (originial one). I differs in the fact that header
numbers where added to be able to better reference to sections and a clarifying section 3.5 was inserted.

The consensus proposal "http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200703/msg00202.html"; was meant as a starting point
for a possible consens discussion. However it is unacceptable to you, right? So its off the table --- I guess.

I'm sorry --- but I hadn't had a chance to look into your answers before the weekend.


~Florian


>>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems <Oliver-Rainer.Wittmann@Sun.COM> 03/26/07 12:27 PM >>>
Florian Reuter wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> wrt. to Oliver analysis.
> 
> I posted a "consensus proposal" as basis for consensus discussion some time ago. This consens was not apprechiated by
> Oliver and Thomas. So the consensus is "off the table" I guess.
> 
> So it makes no sense that Oliver evaluated the reqs wrt. to the consensus proposal, which in fact may have some
problems
> in it. Again, it was meant to be a starting point for a consensus discussion. 
>

I take this statement as very bad habit and as destructive work, because:
- you never takes back your proposal, which you have posted with your 
consensus suggestion, until now.
- you didn't tell me, that I had evaluated the in your eyes wrong 
proposal on *last Thursday noon (MET)*. I had send you my evaluation of 
your proposal in advance before I posted it 8 1/2 hours later on the 
mailing list in order to give you the possibility to give me early feedback.

I'm personally very disappointed about the fact, that I have again find 
out, that constructive collaboration with you isn't possible.

> So when you refer to my proposal please refer to the "original one" and not the "consensus suggestion".
> 

Which one is your "original one"?
The last one, which you've posted - see 
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200703/msg00262.html -, 
doesn't equal any of the previously posted ones.


Regards, Oliver.