[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] comparing requirements againstThomas'/David's/Oliver'sproposal
Hi Florian, Florian Reuter wrote: > Hi Michael, > > === wrt. to questions regarding F1 === > > We're talking about b). > >> What is with a). Is my assumption correct that you believe this >> requirement is met? > >> What is the case for an ODF 1.2 document that does not use the new the >> text:continue-list attribute, but only attributes that ODF 1.1 actually >> supports? Will it be displayed correctly in your opinion? > > This is very hard to state, since everytime I came up with an example I was told that ODF1.0/ODF1.1 isn't clear about > this. This is where my F2 requirement comes from. > > So when I understood correctly you once summarized in a TC meeting that numbered-paragraph are not specified and that > text:list are not specified when they are split. Sorry, but I cannot remember to have said this. What I can remember is that I have said that the current ODF specification does not specify how numbered paragraphs can be combined to lists (which for me personally means that all numbered paragraphs form a single list), and that lists do not have a feature to specify an individual list style for a single item. > > So you concluded that F1) is never an issue for numbered-paragraphs, since they where not specified at all. > You also conluded that F1) is never an issue for text:list, since they also have specification holes. I cannot remember to ever have concluded one of these two things. > > === wrt. to questions regarding F4 === > >> So, can you please explain to me why you think a screen reader would come to a different result. > > I guess the OOo screen reader will read whats displayed and thus the statement "it looks the same" is true. However > readers which are not build upon the layout will come to a different result. > The concern came into my mind when reading the HTML spec. There is a sample regarding tables and screen reader and the > screen reader here clearly operated on the XML structure. Sorry, but I still do nut understand that. The initial list and the resulting list have the same structure, only the style assignments are different. Michael -- Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering StarOffice/OpenOffice.org Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Marcel Schneider, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]