[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] How about an interoperability Subcommittee?
I'd be glad to chat, Alex. But it would be helpful if you could provide a link to the IPR language for UOML so I can look at that before we chat. Best regards, Marbux On 5/8/07, Alex Wang <alexwang@sursen.com> wrote: > Marbux, > The RAND terms of UOML is very similiar as RF mode. You can't find it > because OASIS delete the detailed terms from the charter. I believe it > can meet the requiement of FOSS. I'd like to have further discussion > with you individually on this topic. > > -Alex > > -----Original Message----- > From: marbux [mailto:marbux@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 11:29 AM > To: Alex Wang > Cc: office@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [office] How about an interoperability Subcommittee? > > > Alex, RAND is a big barrier to the extent it would impact ODF. It's > widely implemented by free and open source software (FOSS) with > licensing that does not permit RAND ingredients. And many of those apps > have so many developers who have contributed code that it simply isn't > feasible to locate all of them to sign papers necessary to change the > software licenses, let alone persuade them to do so. > > So the bottom line here is that there are legal aspects to > interoperability as well as technical aspects; that is, unsolvable > interoperability barriers can exist at the legal level as well as the > software level. IPR conflicts are becoming far more common as the > number of standards increase. So while I still am not sure such problems > could be overcome, I am quite certain that to the extent an IPR conflict > exists, it isn't feasible to change the ODF IPR. So it would be your > project that would have to have its IPR scheme altered. > > I don't say that intending any disrespect for your project's IPR or > intending to imply that ODF's IPR scheme is superior (although I have a > personal preference for non-encumbered technology). It's just that I > don't see any feasible way to change the ODF IPR scheme. > > Best regards, > > Marbux > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]