[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] table:filter-condition extension proposal
Hi Thomas, On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 01:51 +0200, Thomas Zander wrote: > On Friday 08 June 2007 21:20:29 Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > I would like to propose an extension to the table:filter-condition > > element to allow storage of multi-string filter data. The details are > > attached to this email > > IMOHO the values look better as text nodes instead of attributes. > so instead of: > <filter-set-item table:value="John Doe”/> > <filter-set-item table:value="Jane Doe”/> > you have > <filter-set-item>John Doe”</filter-set-item> > <filter-set-item>Jane Doe”</filter-set-item> The original motivation for proposing this format: <filter-set-item table:value="John Doe"/> instead of the other format: <filter-set-item>John Doe</filter-set-item> is to make it in line with the 'table:value' attribute of the current table:filter-condition element, which is formatted like this: <filter-condition table:field-number=1 table:operator="=" table:value="Doe"/> Making the value an attribute will, IMHO, make it consistent with the current filter-condition semantics, although in practice it would not matter too much one way or the other. What do others think of this? Kohei
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]